The 21st-Century City

America's Power System Is Powerless
William Yeatman and Jeremy
Lott, 09.02.09, 06:00 PM EDT

Why ''smart grid'' technology is still dumb.

America is a beacon of capitalism, so it can be jarring to discover one of
its largest industries is a redoubt of socialism. State governments have been
running the electricity business, currently a $330-billion-a-year industry,
since Theodore Roosevelt pounded his White House bully pulpit.

Central planning of the electricity industry started during the Progressive
Era, as is the case with many misguided policies. Early in the 20th century,
intervention-minded progressives, such as Wisconsin's Robert "Fighting Bob" La
Follette, concluded that electric companies would consolidate into "natural"
monopolies that preyed on consumers. This was a curious conclusion to reach at a
time when electric companies were competing vigorously in many cities.

Article Controls

email

print

reprint

newsletter

comments

share

del.icio.us

Digg It!

yahoo

Facebook

Twitter

Reddit

rss

Their remedy for this theoretical drift toward natural monopoly was,
incredibly, to establish real government-mandated monopolies. States created
commissions with the regulatory power to outlaw competition among utilities and
set the price of electricity for consumers. By the end of the Great Depression,
almost all Americans bought their electricity from government-backed monopolies,
and it remains so to this day.

The progressives reasoned that electricity providers couldn't abuse consumers
if they labored under the state's thumb, but it's far from that simple. Without
competition, there is no spur for innovation, which is why electricity
transmission and distribution--the system of wires, towers and poles that
transmits electricity from the power plant to your home--haven't changed much
since the regulators stepped in.

That's unfortunate, because while the power system remains frozen in time,
American society as a whole has changed dramatically. The U.S. has become a
wired nation, a people wholly dependent on reliable electricity to power their
computers, phones and iPods. And America's anachronistic electricity supply
chain is failing to keep pace with demand. Massive blackouts in California
(2005), Florida (2008) and the entire Northeast (2003) serve as stark reminders
of the fragility of the U.S. grid.

Congress wants to overhaul the system by spending a king's ransom on
technologies that would give utilities the ability to moderate consumer
demand--by, say, remotely turning down millions of thermostats during periods of
peak use. In theory, this might avoid the supply crunches that can stress the
system to the breaking point, leading to blackouts. Proponents call this a
"smart grid" approach, but it's really a stupid policy, especially when the U.S.
could modernize the system without spending a penny from the government
treasury.

Read
All Comments

It could do so by simply freeing the electricity market from state-sponsored
socialism. Under the Progressive Era regulatory model that persists to this day,
state regulators set a flat rate for electricity, so it costs consumers the same
amount of money whether they use it at 5 p.m. or 5 a.m., even though the cost of
generation is much greater in the afternoon, when demand is higher. If
electricity were priced based on demand rather than on government mandates,
demand would gradually decrease during peak hours when it was more expensive.
Consumers would buy "smart grid" technologies of their own volition, to save
money on their utility bills.

Or consider the ugly transmission lines. Thanks to a state ban on competition
among utilities, the manner in which electricity is provided hasn't changed for
100 years. Enormous power plants in remote locations generate the juice, which
is then transported hundreds of miles on transmission towers and distribution
poles on its way to homes and businesses. It's a long and tenuous supply chain,
which makes it leaky and vulnerable. The blackout that darkened the Northeast in
2003 was caused by a tree branch in Ohio.

Engineers have developed small-scale generation technologies (micro-nuclear
power plants, mini-gas turbines, solar panels and the like) that can
dramatically shorten the distance from generation to end-use. These technologies
could make the grid more reliable and eliminate the need for eyesore
transmission towers. This can't happen right now, however, because state
regulators allow only one provider of electricity in each service area keeping
the energy industry locked into the old energy generation model.

If Congress were serious about addressing the problem of America's outdated
grid, it would encourage states to dismantle the barriers to energy competition.
Instead, it is pushing smart-grid subsidies to further entrench the electric
industry's broken regulatory regime by funneling billions of dollars through
monopolistic utilities and their bureaucratic benefactors in local government.
These subsidies will simply prop up a broken and ossified system.

William Yeatman is an energy policy analyst at the Competitive Enterprise
Institute. Jeremy Lott is an editor at Capital Research Center and author of
The Warm Bucket Brigade: The Story of the American Vice
Presidency.

Return to The
21st-Century City special report.

Read more about Smart Cities here.

The
War On Dollar

When
Employees Go Bad Online

The
Power Of Twilight

The
U.S. On Climate Conference

Read
All Comments

Content
Management Software

Email
Marketing Software

Project
Management Software

Accounting
Software

eCommerce
Software

Help
Desk Software

>> Browse All
Directories